About AEI My AEI Support AEI Contact AEI
Home Events Books Short Publications Research Areas Scholars & Fellows


Search


FindAdvanced Search

Browse all books by:
- Date
- Subject
- Author
- Title

BOOKS
About the AEI Press
Orders and Shipping
Book Reviews
Press Releases

AEI Classics

AEI is rereleasing some of its most prescient and groundbreaking works from its earliest thinkers and innovators. These books, part of a series called AEI Classics, are available for download as Adobe Acrobat PDFs.

E-NEWSLETTERS
Enter e-mail:
 

Home >  Books >  Inequality and Tax Policy
Inequality and Tax Policy
Print Mail
By Alan J. Auerbach, Jon M. Bakija, Robert J. Barro, Alan S. Blinder, Roger H. Gordon, Louis Kaplow, N. Gregory Mankiw, Casey B. Mulligan, Marianne Page, Edmund S. Phelps, James M. Poterba, John E. Roemer, Joel Slemrod
Edited by R. Glenn Hubbard, Kevin A. Hassett
Posted: Thursday, February 1, 2001
Inequality and Tax Policy
Dimensions: 8.75'' x 6''
300 pages
AEI Press  (Washington)
Publication Date: February 2001
Paperback
ISBN: 0844741442
Price: $ 20.00
Add to Cart  
Hardcover
ISBN: 0844741434
Price: $ 40.00
Add to Cart  
Examination Copies

Inequality has become a hot political issue, but there has been little accessible analysis by professional economists on equity issues in tax reform. Inequality and Tax Policy addresses those very issues. Drawing from the most current research, leading specialists in public finance, macroeconomics, and political economy explore key interactions among policy, inequality, and the economy.

Seven essays cover many different aspects of inequality: the interactions between inequality and economic growth, the impact of inequality on program evaluation, how one can measure fairness in the treatment of similarly situated taxpayers, the role of high-income entrepreneurs in wealth creation, and how attempts to redistribute income affect the behavior of taxpayers. Two central questions animate the analysis in Inequality and Tax Policy: What is the philosophical justification for progressive taxation? Is redistribution less desirable or effective in achieving social goals in an increasingly affluent society?

The contributors to Inequality and Tax Policy offer their assessments of whether the current tax system is successfully achieving redistribution and whether the results would be worse under a flat tax.

Inequality and Tax Policy will provide much-needed guidance and some surprising conclusions to economists, policymakers, lawyers, businesspeople, and anyone with an interest in inequality or the U.S. tax system.

Kevin A. Hassett is a resident scholar at AEI and coauthor with James K. Glassman of Dow 36,000: The New Strategy for Profiting from the Coming Rise in the Stock Market (Times Books, 1999). R. Glenn Hubbard is a visiting scholar and director of the tax reform project at AEI and the Russell L. Carson Professor of Economics and Finance at Columbia University.



Table of Contents

Preface
Contributors

  1. Inequality, Growth, and Investment
    Commentary
  2. Tax Policy and Horizontal Equity
    Commentary
  3. Entrepreneurial Saving Decisions and Wealth Inequality
    Commentary
  4. The U.S. Fiscal System as an Opportunity-Equalizing Device
    Commentary
  5. Balanced-Budget Restraint in Taxing Income from Wealth in the Ramsey Model
    Commentary
  6. Growing Inequality and Decreased Tax Progressivity
    Commentary

Index



View Book Summary
Related Links
Related book


Also by Kevin A. Hassett
Recent Articles
Obama's Billions Could Render Furnaces Obsolete
Minnesota's Recount Fiasco Needs New Solution
The Consumer Burden of a Cap-and-Trade System with Freely Allocated Permits
Latest Book
Toward Fundamental Tax Reform

Also by R. Glenn Hubbard
Recent Articles
Low-Interest Mortgages Are the Answer
Blanket Deposit Insurance Is a Bad Idea
The Dismal Questions
Latest Book
Healthy, Wealthy, and Wise
Five Steps to a Better Health Care System
Innovation and Technology Adoption in Health Care Markets
Innovation and Technology Adoption in Health Care Markets

Anupam B. Jena and Tomas J. Philipson argue that the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to curb health care spending may do more harm than good.